VSiN Analytics NBA Report for Friday, January 12
 

 

The following is a collection of analytical data, betting systems and strength ratings featured on VSiN and qualified for the NBA games on Friday, January 12, 2024. This report is meant to emulate the process that Steve Makinen and other members of the VSiN Analytics team undergo when handicapping each day’s NBA board.

Strategies Using NBA DraftKings Betting Splits Data

One of the most touted features on the VSiN.com website, and a feature that we believe to be a fantastic resource for bettors, is the Betting Splits pages. These pages we have built utilize the data that DraftKings so graciously provides to us detailing the breakdowns of the money and ticket splits for point spreads, moneylines, and totals. In an article published on the VSiN.com website on opening day, Steve Makinen outlined 14 different systematic strategies for successfully using the DK Betting Splits Data developed in the 2022-23 season. Here are the systems and qualifying plays for today’s games as of 11:30 a.m. ET. These can and will change, so continue to track and qualify the systems until tip-off for best usage.

DK NBA Betting Splits system #1: 

When 63% or more of the handle was on the home side of an ATS wager, this supermajority group was 115-88 ATS (56.6%) last season. In other words, if you see nearly 2/3 of the handle backing a host in an NBA game this season, it’s a solid bet to follow it.

System Matches (PLAY ALL): MIAMI, MINNESOTA, SAN ANTONIO, UTAH

DK NBA Betting Splits system #2: The number from system #1 is a little higher for road wagers. When 65% or more of the handle was on the road side of an ATS wager, this supermajority group was 95-69 ATS (57.9%) last season. Remember, handle is the total amount of money on a game. This group was pretty sharp last season.

System Matches (PLAY ALL): HOUSTON, LA CLIPPERS

 

At this point, unlike the football studies I conducted, it's safe to assume that being part of the majority handle of DraftKings bettors on ATS wagers is a relatively sound strategy.

The following two systems show some successes that majority groups at DraftKings enjoyed when looking at bet volume:

DK NBA Betting Splits system #5: We saw earlier that the supermajority benchmark for handle success on ATS was wagers at 63%. It’s a touch higher when analyzing the number of bets. When 69% or more of the number of bets was on the home side of an ATS wager, this supermajority group was 81-55 ATS (59.6%) last season, leaps and bounds above the overall success of all majorities.

System Matches (PLAY ALL): PHILADELPHIA, MINNESOTA, SAN ANTONIO, UTAH

DK NBA Betting Splits system #6: In NBA nonconference games (East versus West) of 2023, DK majority number of bets groups were highly successful, as they went 134-110 ATS (54.9%). If you consider that the overall majority numbers showed a 51.4% success rate, they were 3.5% improved on these rarer contests.

System Matches (PLAY ALL): PHILADELPHIA, HOUSTON, CHICAGO, SAN ANTONIO, UTAH

 

The overall numbers shown earlier detailed that majority bettors took heavy losses on moneyline wagering last season. Here are some more detailed specifics:

DK NBA Betting Splits system #7: When the majority handle was on double-digit favorites in a 2023 NBA game, this majority group was 92-22 outright but lost -55.45 units, an R.O.I. of -48.6%. This significant loss rate shows how losing just over one of every five games can still be damaging.

System Matches (FADE): MINNESOTA ML

 

A winning angle for majority handle moneyline bettors:

DK NBA Betting Splits system #9: When the majority handle was on underdogs for a moneyline wager, this majority group actually produced profits, going 54-82 for +5.5 units and an R.O.I. of 4.0%. This doesn’t seem to be a really significant amount, but when compared to the overall losses of -68.8 units, it represents a significant improvement.  Again, it is quite rare, though, as there were 771 games in our sample.

System Matches (PLAY ALL): SACRAMENTO ML, GOLDEN STATE ML

 

These last three systems involve totals.

DK NBA Betting Splits system #11: One of the best and most frequent angles I was able to uncover was when less than 60% of bettors were backing the Over in an NBA game. I told you earlier that most NBA bettors love taking Overs. When less than 60% of the handle favored that total option, you could almost conclude that they didn’t like it as much, regardless of whether or not it was a majority. Only 271 of the games fit this criteria, but the results were astounding, with Under the total on these games going 163-108, good for 60.1%.

System Matches (PLAY UNDER ALL): IND-ATL, HOU-DET, LAC-MEM, POR-MIN, CHA-SAS

DK NBA Betting Splits system #12: When a supermajority of 58% or more of the number of bets was on the Under in an NBA game total, this majority group was quite sharp, 40-19 ATS (67.8%). This number for a supermajority is quite low, evidence of how rarely the betting public bets the low side of a total.

System Matches (PLAY UNDER ALL): IND-ATL, CHA-SAS

DK NBA Betting Splits system #14: In NBA games with extremely high totals last season, or those more than 242, majority handle bettors were 18-7 (72%).

System Matches (PLAY OVER): IND-ATL

 

Schedule Situations Crucial for NBA Handicapping

The following is an expanded version of the article published in this year’s VSiN NBA Betting Guide, detailing scheduling situations in which teams have shown definitive patterns over the last few seasons. Typically, there are reasons that teams perform at varying levels based on their schedules, whether that be from the amount of rest they’ve gotten before a game, how fatigued they are from a string of games, or how they deal with injuries/workloads based upon the schedule pressures.

We will be tracking 50 top scheduling situations all season long!

* Home teams playing a 4th in 6 Days game were 37-17 SU and 29-24-1 ATS (54.7%) hosting teams playing in an A2A b2b game last season.

1/12: MINNESOTA vs. Portland

System Match: PLAY MINNESOTA (-15.5 vs POR)

 

* Under the total was 77-47 (62.1%) over the last two seasons when the road team was on One Day Rest and the host was playing a 3rd Home in 4 Days game.

1/12: Under the total in DETROIT-HOUSTON

System Match: PLAY UNDER the total (o/u at 227.5)

 

* Over the total was 71-40 (64%) over the last two seasons when the road team was on a A2A b2b and the host team was playing a 4th in 6 Days game.

1/12: Over the total in MINNESOTA-PORTLAND

System Match: PLAY OVER the total (o/u at 221.5)

 

* Over the total was 62-42 (59.6%) over the last two seasons when the road team was on a A2A b2b and the host was playing a 3rd in 4 Days game.

1/12: Over the total in MINNESOTA-PORTLAND

System Match: PLAY OVER the total (o/u at 221.5)

 

Top Team-Specific Scheduling Situation Trends

The following are some of the top team-specific trends that have developed in the NBA over the last few seasons when considering scheduling situations. Like the league-wide systems introduced earlier, naturally, there are reasons that certain teams perform at varying levels based upon their schedules, whether that be from the amount of rest they’ve gotten before a game, how fatigued they are from a string of games, or how they deal with injuries/workloads based upon the schedule pressures.

NO QUALIFYING TEAM SPECIFIC SITUATION TRENDS TODAY

 

NBA Team Strength Systems

The following handicapping information details five betting systems for teams based on various team strength indicators or line scenarios. Unless noted, these are from the last three NBA seasons.

NBA Team Strength Betting System #1:

In games between two teams with 60%+ winning percentages, home teams favored in the -4.5 to -9.5 range are on a 112-29 SU and 93-48 ATS (66%) run.

System Matches: PLAY DENVER (-8.5 vs NOP)

 

NBA Team Strength Betting System #2:

In games between two teams with 40% or less winning percentages, and lines of 4.5 or less either way, road teams are on a 79-47 SU and 76-47-3 ATS (61.8%) surge.

System Matches: PLAY CHARLOTTE (+3 at SAS)

 

NBA Team Strength Betting System #5:

Double-digit NBA games have produced some definitive results on totals over the last three seasons, dependent upon what type of matchup it was. In divisional games featuring double-digit lines, Under the total has gone 68-55 (55.3%). In nonconference games, Over the total was 122-97 (55.7%). And finally, in non-divisional conference games, Over the total was 169-117 (59.1%).

System Matches: PLAY UNDER in POR-MIN (o/u at 221.5)

 

NBA Extreme Stats Next Game Systems

These systems search for extreme statistical performances in NBA games and detail the results of the follow-up game for the teams. These systems are from the last three seasons unless noted.

BIG TIME OFFENSIVE PERFORMANCES

  1. Teams that scored 134 points or more in any given game have had trouble duplicating that success in their next outing, as they are just 208-210 SU and 178-230-10 ATS (43.6%) in the follow-up contest.

System Matches: FADE NEW ORLEANS (+8.5 at DEN), FADE ATLANTA (-5.5 vs IND)

  1. NBA teams off a game in which they were granted 35 or more free throw attempts trended Under the total the next game, 242-191 (55.9%) since 2021.

System Match: PLAY UNDER in IND-ATL (o/u at 252)

 

BLOWOUT GAMES ARE RED FLAGS

  1. NBA teams that beat a point spread by 30 points or more in any given game have gone just 65-64 SU and 56-68-5 ATS (45.2%) in their next game.

System Match: FADE NEW ORLEANS (+8.5 at DEN)

4. NBA teams that lose on a point spread by 30 points or more in any given game have rebounded nicely the next game, going 71-53 SU and 71-53 ATS (57.3%).

System Matches: PLAY GOLDEN STATE (+3 at CHI), PLAY PORTLAND (+15.5 at MIN)

 

NBA Streak Systems

The following handicapping information details nine betting systems for teams on winning or losing streaks of at least four games in the NBA.

NO QUALIFYING STREAK PLAYS TODAY

 

Today’s NBA Strength Ratings

The following are taken from today’s MAKINEN DAILY RATINGS page under the NBA tab on VSiN.com. Listed by team, current line, and difference between rating and current line (in parenthesis).

Today’s Top 3 UNDERPRICED UNDERDOGS according to the Makinen POWER RATINGS projections:

Ratings Matches: 1. MEMPHIS +8.5 (+1.3), 2. SACRAMENTO +1 (+0.6), 3. INDIANA +5.5 (+0.5)

 

Today’s Top 3 UNDERPRICED FAVORITES according to the Makinen POWER RATINGS projections:

Ratings Matches: 1. SAN ANTONIO -3 (+2.9), 2. DENVER -8.5 (+1.8), 3. UTAH -3 (+1.7)

 

Today’s Top 3 UNDERPRICED UNDERDOGS according to the Makinen EFFECTIVE STRENGTH RATINGS projections:

Ratings Matches: 1. DETROIT +7.5 (+3.4), 2. SACRAMENTO +1 (+1.9), 3. GOLDEN STATE +3 (+0.1)

 

Today’s Top 3 UNDERPRICED FAVORITES according to the Makinen EFFECTIVE STRENGTH RATINGS projections:

Ratings Matches: 1. MINNESOTA -15.5 (+2.0), 2. SAN ANTONIO -3 (+1.6), 3. ATLANTA -5.5 (+0.7)

 

Today’s Top 3 BIGGEST TOTAL PROJECTIONS FAVORING OVER according to the Makinen EFFECTIVE STRENGTH RATINGS projections:

Ratings Matches: 1. TOR-UTA OVER 240.5 (+4.3), 2. IND-ATL OVER 252 (+2.2), 3. LAC-MEM OVER 224.5 (+0.8)

 

Today’s Top 3 BIGGEST TOTAL PROJECTIONS FAVORING UNDER according to the Makinen EFFECTIVE STRENGTH RATINGS projections:

Ratings Matches: 1. SAC-PHI UNDER 241 (-2.8), 2. NOP-DEN UNDER 228.5 (-2.4), 3. GSW-CHI UNDER 228 (-1.2)

 

Today’s Top 3 UNDERPRICED UNDERDOGS according to the Makinen BETTORS RATINGS projections:

Ratings Matches: 1. MEMPHIS +8.5 (+1.3), 2. CHARLOTTE +3 (+0.6), 3. TORONTO +3 (+0.5)

 

Today’s Top 3 UNDERPRICED FAVORITES according to the Makinen BETTORS RATINGS projections:

Ratings Matches: 1. DENVER -8.5 (+4.5), 2. ATLANTA -5.5 (+4.2), 3. PHILADELPHIA -1 (+2.0)

 

Today’s Top 3 BIGGEST TOTAL PROJECTIONS FAVORING OVER according to the Makinen BETTORS RATINGS projections:

Ratings Matches: 1. IND-ATL OVER 252 (+3.8), 2. LAC-MEM OVER 224.5 (+1.5), 3. HOU-DET OVER 227.5 (+0.7)

 

Today’s Top 3 BIGGEST TOTAL PROJECTIONS FAVORING UNDER according to the Makinen BETTORS RATINGS projections:

Ratings Matches: 1. CHA-SAS UNDER 236 (-5.4), 2. NOP-DEN UNDER 228.5 (-4.6), 3. GSW-CHI UNDER 228 (-2.6)

 

Top Daily H2h Series Trends

Here are the top head-to-head series trends in play for all of today’s games:

(519) CHARLOTTE at (520) SAN ANTONIO

* CHARLOTTE has won the last five ATS vs. San Antonio

System Match: PLAY CHARLOTTE ATS

 

(513) GOLDEN STATE at (514) CHICAGO

* GOLDEN STATE is on an 8-2 ATS run vs. Chicago

System Match: PLAY GOLDEN STATE ATS

  
Read Full Article
  
  

Avatar photo

By VSiN