The Warnock Algorithm, Reimagined for Sports Betting: A Divide-and-Conquer Playbook for ML-Driven Predictions

The Warnock algorithm is a classic image-space, divide-and-conquer method for resolving visible surfaces in computer graphics. Reframed for sports betting, it becomes a rigorous way to recursively partition the game/market state space into tiles where predictions are “trivial” (high signal, low ambiguity) and escalate modeling only where ambiguity remains. The result is a hierarchical, adaptive forecasting system that’s fast, interpretable, and well-suited to real-time betting markets.

---

1) What is the Warnock Algorithm (in its native habitat)?

Originally devised by John Warnock (1969) for visible-surface determination, the algorithm renders complex scenes by:

1. Considering the whole image window.

2. Checking for “trivial” cases (e.g., one polygon clearly dominates the window).

3. If not trivial, subdivide the window into four quadrants and repeat.

4. Stop when a region becomes trivial (or small enough) and render directly.

Key properties:

• Divide-and-conquer over image space (not object space).

• Adaptive refinement only where needed (complex or ambiguous areas get more work).

• Graceful handling of occlusion/conflict by zooming into problematic regions.

These properties map surprisingly well to complex, overlapping signals in betting data.

---

2) Mapping to Sports Betting Problems

Analogy

• Polygons / surfaces ⟶ competing predictive signals (team form, player props, market prices, weather, injuries, rest, travel).

• Occlusion ⟶ conflicting signals (e.g., sharp money vs. public money; model vs. market).

• Image window ⟶ a state window of the game/market (time remaining, score differential, possession, line/price).

• Trivial region ⟶ a portion of state space where a single signal or model clearly dominates and uncertainty is low.

• Subdivision ⟶ recursively tile the state space until uncertainty drops below a threshold; fit or select the simplest reliable model at that granularity.

Why this helps

• Sports data are heterogeneous and context-dependent. One global model often over- or under-fits sub-contexts.

• Markets shift rapidly; real-time systems need fast fallback predictions for trivial contexts and deeper modeling only where needed.

• The hierarchy yields interpretability (“in this context/tile, this is the dominant driver”) and efficient compute.

---

3) Defining the State Window and the Tiles

A practical live (in-play) NFL example:

Feature axes to tile on:

• Game clock (e.g., seconds remaining or quarter + clock)

• Score differential

• Field position or possession (binary/categorical)

• Market variable(s): current moneyline/point spread/total

• Latent context flags: weather class, QB injury flag, rest days, etc.

Start with a coarse hyperrectangle across these axes; call it $\mathcal{W}_0$. Within $\mathcal{W}_0$, you’ll have:

• A dominant signal test (is one model or factor reliably superior?).

• An ambiguity/uncertainty test (predictive entropy, posterior variance, miscalibration).

• A support test (enough samples?).

If any “triviality” criterion is met, stop subdividing and emit a prediction using the simplest appropriate model. Otherwise, subdivide $\mathcal{W}$ along one or more axes (Warnock uses a 2×2 split; in higher-dimensional feature spaces you can:

• Split along the axis of highest heterogeneity (variance/MI),

• Or along the most impactful feature (feature importance),

• Or balanced by density to maintain sample sizes.

---

4) Triviality Tests for Betting Tiles

Use one or more:

1. Dominance test
   If a baseline model $M_b$ (e.g., market-implied probability) is consistently better than alternatives $M_1, M_2,\dots$ in $\mathcal{W}$ by a margin $\Delta$ (Brier/NLL/CRPS), mark trivial → use $M_b$.

2. Confidence test
   If the ensemble/predictive posterior has low entropy or narrow credible intervals within $\mathcal{W}$, treat as trivial → use ensemble mean.

3. Heuristic constraints
   Early first quarter, big favorite at home, no injuries, market spread within a well-calibrated historical band → trivial.

4. Data sufficiency
   If support is too low to justify subdivision, stop and borrow strength from parent nodes (hierarchical shrinkage).

---

5) Modeling Stack Inside Each Tile

Once a tile $\mathcal{W}$ is deemed trivial: use the simplest model that’s well-calibrated. If non-trivial: split and recurse. Candidates, ordered by complexity:

• Rule/Heuristic (super fast; great when patterns are stable).

• Calibrated Baseline: market-implied probabilities with Platt/Isotonic calibration; Elo-like priors updated in-play.

• Generalized Additive Models: handle smooth effects of time/score.

• Tree-based models (XGBoost/LightGBM) with monotonic constraints.

• Bayesian hierarchical models: partial pooling across teams/seasons; natural for uncertainty quantification and tile-to-tile sharing.

• RNN/Temporal Transformers on drive-level sequences; optionally gated by tile membership (only where ambiguity is high).

Key idea: Don’t commit to a single monolithic model. Let the Warnock-style hierarchy route traffic: trivial tiles use fast, transparent logic; complex tiles trigger richer learners.

---

6) Aggregation: From Leaves Back to the Whole

Like Warnock’s rendering, after subdividing ambiguous regions and resolving predictions, you must aggregate seamlessly:

• Prediction assembly: the final probability for a live query $x$ is the prediction of its leaf tile model.

• Smoothing across boundaries: apply hierarchical priors or kernel blending near tile borders to avoid sharp discontinuities.

• Calibration at multiple levels: per-tile calibration + global post-hoc calibration on out-of-fold residuals.

• Uncertainty propagation: store posterior variance/entropy at tiles; parent nodes maintain summary uncertainty for fallbacks.

---

7) Practical Pipeline

Data sources

• Market: live prices, spreads/totals, hold %, book-to-book diffs.

• Performance: play-by-play, drive summaries, player tracking (if available).

• Exogenous: weather class, travel, rest, injuries/inactives.

• Derived: EPA, success rate, timeouts, 4th-down aggressiveness, QB pressure rate, coverage shells (if charted).

Feature engineering

• Time-aligned rolling features (but keep them leak-free).

• Interaction flags that often drive heterogeneity: late-game & small lead, two-minute drill, rain & outdoor & deep underdog, etc.

• Market-model deltas: $p_\text{model} - p_\text{market}$, Z-scores vs. historical priors.

Warnock-style controller (pseudo-code)

function predict(state x, window W0):
  Q ← [W0]
  while Q not empty:
    W ← pop(Q)
    if x ∉ W: continue
    if is_trivial(W):
        return model_W(x)
    else:
        {W1..Wk} ← subdivide(W)           # choose axis by heterogeneity/support
        attach_models({W1..Wk})           # lazy: fit on demand or pre-fit nightly
        push {W1..Wk} onto Q
  return fallback_global(x)

Triviality detectors

• dominance(W): perf(M_b) – max perf(M_alt) > Δ

• confidence(W): entropy(post_W) < τ

• support(W): n(W) ≥ n_min (else stop and shrink to parent)

Model training regimen

• Nightly: refresh tile boundaries using last N seasons + recent games.

• During live: online updates for likelihood terms + calibration layers.

• Cross-validation: spatiotemporal CV (by week/team/season) to avoid leakage across tiles.

---

8) Example: Live NFL Moneyline

Goal: Probability home team wins at time $t$.

State window $\mathcal{W}_0$:

• $t$ (seconds left), score diff $d$, possession $z$, field position $f$,

• market ML price $m$, timeouts $(T_h, T_a)$, drive success proxy $S$,

• weather class $w$.

Process:

1. Early game, large favorite, neutral weather: trivial → calibrated baseline (market-implied + slight prior).

2. Mid-game, tight score, QB injury just reported, market lagging: non-trivial → subdivide on $d$ and $t$; child tiles route to gradient-boosted model with injury features and live EPA.

3. Two-minute drill, one timeout each, field position near midfield: still ambiguous → deeper tile with sequence model (Transformer over last 10 plays) to capture tempo and playcalling tendencies.

Result: Fast responses for 70–80% of states; heavy models wake only for the ~20–30% of hard states where edge is plausible and latency is still controlled.

---

9) Same-Game Parlays & Correlation

Parlay pricing suffers when correlations are mis-estimated. A Warnock hierarchy helps by conditioning correlation structure on tile context:

• In a tile with clock low + trailing team, pass rate spikes, boosting QB yards and WR receptions → correlation up.

• In a weather-bad + lead-protected tile, rushing attempts and under total become more correlated.

Implement by maintaining tile-specific copulas or tile-conditioned latent factors (e.g., low-rank covariance per tile with hierarchical shrinkage to avoid overfitting).

---

10) Risk & Trading Applications

• Latency budgets: trivial tiles are cheap → guaranteed sub-100ms inference; reserve millisecond-heavy models for rare tiles.

• Guardrails: tile-level uncertainty thresholds can block auto-betting when risk is high (entropy > τ).

• Market surveillance: treat books as signals; tiles with book disagreement (high occlusion) trigger alerts and deeper modeling.

• Limit sizing: bet size $\propto$ edge × confidence; cap by tile entropy and historical miscalibration in that tile.

---

11) Evaluation & Diagnostics

• Per-tile calibration curves (reliability plots).

• Boundary smoothness checks: ensure no step-function pathologies across neighboring tiles.

• Leaf depth distribution: confirm most traffic ends in shallow leaves (efficiency).

• Ablations: remove subdivision on a given axis and measure loss in NLL/CRPS.

• Drift monitors: KL divergence of tile occupancy and feature marginals week-to-week.

---

12) Implementation Notes (Pythonic)

• Controller: a lightweight router object that:

  • Stores tile definitions (kd-tree or quadtree in reduced subspace).

  • Caches fitted models per tile.

  • Exposes predict(x) with lazy fitting and back-pressure limits.

• Models:

  • sklearn for GAM-like via spline features, xgboost/lightgbm for trees.

  • pymc/stan for hierarchical Bayes in data-sparse tiles.

  • pytorch for sequence models, gated by tile membership.

• Training:

  • Use feature hashing + monotonic constraints for stability.

  • Stick to monotonicity on time remaining and absolute score diff when appropriate.

  • Calibrate everything (isotonic at tile-level; global temperature scaling).

• Storage:

  • Persist tile schemas and calibration maps with versioning.

  • Maintain “shadow” models observing live flow for A/B comparisons.

---

13) Pitfalls & Mitigations

• Data sparsity in deep tiles → Use partial pooling and stop rules; don’t over-split.

• Boundary artifacts → Blend predictions near borders; learn soft gating (mixture-of-experts with tile priors).

• Latency spikes → Pre-warm heavy models for tiles that historically become active (endgame, injuries).

• Leakage → Strictly roll forward in CV; tile on features that are known at prediction time only.

• Over-confidence → Track tile-wise calibration; inflate variance where history shows error clustering.

---

14) Extensions

• Meta-learning to optimize split criteria and triviality thresholds end-to-end (learn to subdivide).

• Causal overlays: run IV/DoWhy checks inside contentious tiles (e.g., weather signals confounded by opponent style).

• Multi-market coherence: share tile structure across moneyline, spread, and total to keep no-arbitrage constraints tight.

---

15) Takeaways

• The Warnock algorithm’s genius—solve the easy parts cheaply, zoom only on the hard parts—maps cleanly to sports betting prediction.

• In practice you get:

  • Speed (most states trivial),

  • Accuracy where it matters (ambiguity gets extra modeling),

  • Interpretability (tile-level stories),

  • Risk control (uncertainty-aware routing and sizing).