Regulatory Pushback Fuels End Of 'Risk Free Bets' In U.S.
Regulatory Pushback Fuels End Of 'Risk Free Bets' In U.S.

The allure of a “risk-free bet” feels obvious. What better way to join a sports betting platform than with a wager that doesn't carry any risk?

In recent years, new bettors were inundated with marketing materials from mobile sportsbook operators about “risk-free” sign-up bonuses. Customers loved the offers, and operators used the phrasing to attract new customers in competitive state markets, but after regulatory pushback operators are moving away from the risk-free term.'

Those risk-free bets weren't absent risk. In most cases, they involved digital sportsbooks offering a customer replacement betting funds for an initial wagering loss, and if a bettor lost a second wager using the replacement funds, they were out their initial stake.

Some regulators have thus objected to the risk-free phrasing, especially in newly legalized states like Ohio and Massachusetts where there’s been special focus on responsible gambling policies. Those states’ regulators helped spur an industry-wide shift in which multiple major operators, whether voluntarily or as a state requirement, have dropped “risk free” from their marketing. It’s a shift that responsible gaming experts hoped would have taken place via self-correction years ago.'

“It never should have happened,” Alan Feldman, a distinguished fellow in responsible gaming for UNLV's International Gaming Institute, said of the questionable terminology. “Gambling, by its definition, is putting something of value at risk. Although I appreciate philosophically what the companies are going after, in gambling terms it needs to be more clear.”

U.K. operators used phrase in early 2000s

Legal sports betting has become widespread in the U.S. over the last few years, after the repeal of PASPA in 2018, and risk-free bets became a frequently used phrase by U.S. sportsbook operators.'

The term didn't originate in the last five years, though, as it was prevalent in Europe earlier this century. Online sports betting took off in the U.K. in the early 2000s, and risk-free wagers were used by operators hoping to acquire customers in the new market.'

“They’ve long been the main marketing tool used for acquiring new customers for well over a decade,” Alun Bowden, a senior consultant at Eilers and Krejcik Gaming, told via email. “They’re part of the furniture. The terminology tends to vary, from risk-free bets to free bets to money back, or more recently cash back as a way of differentiating from betting credits, but it all means the same thing.”

Bill Esdaile is the managing director of Square in the Air, a marketing consultancy for sports and betting companies, and he worked at Sporting Index for about a decade in the early 2000s. Sporting Index set up Sporting Odds (now Sportingbet), which was one of the first online sportsbooks in the U.K.'

Esdaile remembers operators racking their brains in the early 2000s as they searched for ways to acquire customers.

“Everyone was moving toward this weird and wonderful thing called the internet and didn't know how to persuade sportsbook players to join,” Esdaile said.'

Free bets, which came in the form of “risk-free” offers with a site credit given in return for a losing bet or as a standalone bonus bet, became a popular choice among operators.

As more operators entered the U.K. market, the competition increased. That meant more competitive free-bet deals in an attempt to gain market share. The language of both “risk-free bet” and “free bet” became popular among operators and familiar among customers.'

“It was just sign-up offer upon sign-up offer,” Esdaile said.'

Esdaile doesn't credit responsible gambling measures as the catalyst for a gradual decline of various free-bet offers in the U.K. years ago — it instead came due to the market maturing and the offers holding less value to sportsbooks — but there have been increased responsible gambling measures in the U.K. in recent years. Bowden says there's been a shift in the U.K. from various free-bet promotions, including risk-free wagers, to other marketing efforts.'

“Recently we’ve definitely seen a move away from 'risk free' type bets and toward boosted odds as a main tool to engage with existing customers. … This is largely due to more regulatory scrutiny of the language around these offers,” Bowden said.'

Similar trajectory in the U.S.

When the legal mobile market launched in the U.S., operators wanted market share. Hence lucrative promotional offers became common, often using “risk-free bet” language as an enticement similar to what had been seen in Europe. They seemingly provide customers with an advantage over the sportsbooks, as bettors eagerly try to turn the promotions into money.'

For the operator, the marketing costs of offering those promotions can be justified. In theory, if an operator convinces a user to bet with them, they can become a loyal customer with lifetime value to the sportsbook. U.S. operators often compete against each other for the best sign-up promotions at each state's launch, leading to an increase in risk-free bet size.

While many sportsbooks have offered a few hundred dollars worth of “risk-free” bets for new users, some operators have gone bigger. Caesars Sportsbook, for example, has gone as high as a $5,000 risk-free bet for new users. At one point, SI Sportsbook offered a $7,500 risk-free bet in Colorado.'

 

“What also differs markedly between the U.S. and the U.K., in particular, is the generosity of these, with the U.K. offers usually capped at £10 or £20 due in part to the huge volume of matched betting that occurs,” Bowden said.'

While U.S. operators borrowed the “risk-free” terminology from the U.K., they skyrocketed the amount of potential risk involved. Instead of users having roughly $20 at stake, bettors were able to risk hundreds or even thousands of dollars through the promotions.

“The U.S. market has really gone hard with these types of offers and on a scale the global market just hasn’t seen before,” Bowden said.

Misleading phrasing

While the promotions have offered value to customers, most of the risk-free bonuses offered by U.S. operators weren't actually risk free in light of how multiple losing wagers would cost the bettor money. That has come to concern regulators as well as advocates for responsible gambling, even if the offers get touted as highly valuable in some other outlets beyond the sportsbooks themselves.'