I’ve always found that it’s important to exercise patience with college teams. Just think about what you were like between the ages of 18-24. Everybody has a different experience in those college years or while working on a trade, but the same themes are present throughout. You’re learning how to grow up. How to be an adult. How to navigate relationships and live in the real world.
While athletes have different responsibilities and reach stages in their lives at a different pace than most of us, there is still a high level of unpredictability when it comes to college football. As a result, I try to wait until we get a decent sample size to start making some big determinations on teams. There are some that you need to adjust quicker than others because of market conditions, injuries or obvious characteristics, but Week 4 and Week 5 tend to be good spots to realize what teams are and what they aren’t.
The reality is that one-third of the regular season is over for a lot of these teams. Some had early bye weeks, which can be a blessing or a curse, but most of the nation’s programs have played four games. You don’t want to overreact to one game or two games, but patterns are starting to emerge.
What is really striking heading into this week is that most of the lines I’ve had that have been off from the market have been wrong. That will happen as you create your own numbers and have differences of opinion, but sometimes you’ll be right and sometimes you’ll be wrong. For me, I’ve been wrong more often than I’ve been right, so there are some big adjustments this week on some teams that have consistently fallen short of expectation and some that have been much better than I (and many others) anticipated.
Here are my Week 5 Power Ratings:
Rank |
Team |
Conference |
PR |
HFA |
1 |
Georgia |
SEC |
98.5 |
3.5 |
2 |
Alabama |
SEC |
96.5 |
3.5 |
3 |
Ohio State |
Big Ten |
93.5 |
3.5 |
4 |
Michigan |
Big Ten |
89 |
3 |
5 |
USC |
Pac-12 |
86 |
2 |
6 |
Clemson |
ACC |
85.5 |
3.5 |
7 |
Tennessee |
SEC |
83.5 |
2.5 |
8 |
Oklahoma |
Big 12 |
83 |
3.5 |
9 |
Oklahoma State |
Big 12 |
83 |
3 |
10 |
Utah |
Pac-12 |
83 |
3.5 |
11 |
Arkansas |
SEC |
83 |
2 |
12 |
Texas A&M |
SEC |
82.5 |
3.5 |
13 |
Washington |
Pac-12 |
81.5 |
2 |
14 |
Ole Miss |
SEC |
81 |
2 |
15 |
Cincinnati |
AAC |
81 |
3.5 |
16 |
Penn State |
Big Ten |
81 |
2.5 |
17 |
Oregon |
Pac-12 |
80.5 |
3 |
18 |
Texas |
Big 12 |
80.5 |
2 |
19 |
Kentucky |
SEC |
80 |
2 |
20 |
Florida State |
ACC |
79.5 |
2 |
21 |
LSU |
SEC |
79 |
2.5 |
22 |
Mississippi State |
SEC |
79 |
2.5 |
23 |
Kansas State |
Big 12 |
78.5 |
2 |
24 |
Baylor |
Big 12 |
78.5 |
2 |
25 |
Oregon State |
Pac-12 |
78 |
2 |
26 |
BYU |
Independent |
77.5 |
2 |
27 |
Wisconsin |
Big Ten |
77 |
2 |
28 |
TCU |
Big 12 |
77 |
2 |
29 |
NC State |
ACC |
77 |
3 |
30 |
Notre Dame |
Independent |
76.5 |
3.5 |
31 |
Florida |
SEC |
76 |
3 |
32 |
Minnesota |
Big Ten |
76 |
2 |
33 |
Louisville |
ACC |
75.5 |
2 |
34 |
Wake Forest |
ACC |
75.5 |
2.5 |
35 |
Miami (FL) |
ACC |
75 |
2.5 |
36 |
Maryland |
Big Ten |
74.5 |
2 |
37 |
Iowa State |
Big 12 |
74.5 |
2.5 |
38 |
UCF |
AAC |
74.5 |
3.5 |
39 |
UCLA |
Pac-12 |
74.5 |
2 |
40 |
Purdue |
Big Ten |
74 |
2 |
41 |
Pitt |
ACC |
73 |
2 |
42 |
West Virginia |
Big 12 |
72.5 |
2.5 |
43 |
Iowa |
Big Ten |
72 |
3 |
44 |
Texas Tech |
Big 12 |
72 |
2 |
45 |
North Carolina |
ACC |
72 |
2 |
46 |
SMU |
AAC |
72 |
3.5 |
47 |
Washington State |
Pac-12 |
71.5 |
3 |
48 |
Syracuse |
ACC |
71.5 |
2 |
49 |
Appalachian State |
Sun Belt |
71.5 |
3.5 |
50 |
Kansas |
Big 12 |
71 |
1 |
51 |
Illinois |
Big Ten |
70.5 |
1.5 |
52 |
East Carolina |
AAC |
70.5 |
1.5 |
53 |
Auburn |
SEC |
70 |
3 |
54 |
Air Force |
Mountain West |
70 |
2.5 |
55 |
Tulane |
AAC |
70 |
3 |
56 |
James Madison |
Sun Belt |
70 |
2 |
57 |
Michigan State |
Big Ten |
69.5 |
2 |
58 |
South Carolina |
SEC |
69.5 |
2 |
59 |
Boise State |
Mountain West |
68.5 |
2.5 |
60 |
Marshall |
Sun Belt |
68.5 |
2 |
61 |
California |
Pac-12 |
68.5 |
2 |
62 |
UAB |
Conference USA |
68 |
3.5 |
63 |
Stanford |
Pac-12 |
68 |
2 |
64 |
South Alabama |
Sun Belt |
68 |
2 |
65 |
Houston |
AAC |
67.5 |
2 |
66 |
Virginia Tech |
ACC |
67.5 |
2 |
67 |
Western Kentucky |
Conference USA |
67.5 |
2 |
68 |
UTSA |
Conference USA |
67 |
2 |
69 |
Troy |
Sun Belt |
66.5 |
2 |
70 |
Fresno State |
Mountain West |
66 |
2.5 |
71 |
Coastal Carolina |
Sun Belt |
66 |
2 |
72 |
Indiana |
Big Ten |
66 |
2 |
73 |
Toledo |
MAC |
66 |
2.5 |
74 |
Army |
Independent |
65.5 |
3 |
75 |
Nebraska |
Big Ten |
65.5 |
1.5 |
76 |
Missouri |
SEC |
65 |
2.5 |
77 |
Liberty |
Independent |
64.5 |
3.5 |
78 |
UNLV |
Mountain West |
65 |
1 |
79 |
Arizona |
Pac-12 |
64.5 |
2 |
80 |
Memphis |
AAC |
64 |
3.5 |
81 |
Arizona State |
Pac-12 |
64 |
2.5 |
82 |
San Diego State |
Mountain West |
63 |
2 |
83 |
Tulsa |
AAC |
62.5 |
2 |
84 |
Rutgers |
Big Ten |
62 |
1.5 |
85 |
South Florida |
AAC |
62 |
2 |
86 |
Duke |
ACC |
61.5 |
2 |
87 |
Boston College |
ACC |
61.5 |
2 |
88 |
Georgia Southern |
Sun Belt |
61 |
2.5 |
89 |
Vanderbilt |
SEC |
61 |
1 |
90 |
Miami (OH) |
MAC |
61 |
3 |
91 |
Southern Miss |
Sun Belt |
61 |
2 |
92 |
San Jose State |
Mountain West |
61 |
2 |
93 |
Virginia |
ACC |
61 |
3 |
94 |
Northwestern |
Big Ten |
60 |
2 |
95 |
Wyoming |
Mountain West |
60 |
2.5 |
96 |
Northern Illinois |
MAC |
59.5 |
2 |
97 |
Louisiana |
Sun Belt |
59.5 |
3 |
98 |
Georgia Tech |
ACC |
59 |
2 |
99 |
Middle Tennessee |
Conference USA |
59 |
2.5 |
100 |
Old Dominion |
Sun Belt |
58.5 |
2 |
101 |
Florida Atlantic |
Conference USA |
58.5 |
3 |
102 |
Kent State |
MAC |
58.5 |
2.5 |
103 |
Utah State |
Mountain West |
58 |
2 |
104 |
Arkansas State |
Sun Belt |
57.5 |
2 |
105 |
Navy |
AAC |
57.5 |
2 |
106 |
North Texas |
Conference USA |
57.5 |
2 |
107 |
Georgia State |
Sun Belt |
57.5 |
2 |
108 |
Central Michigan |
MAC |
57 |
2.5 |
109 |
Eastern Michigan |
MAC |
56.5 |
2 |
110 |
UTEP |
Conference USA |
56 |
1 |
111 |
Louisiana Tech |
Conference USA |
55.5 |
2 |
112 |
Ohio |
MAC |
54.5 |
2 |
113 |
Western Michigan |
MAC |
54 |
2 |
114 |
Ball State |
MAC |
54 |
2 |
115 |
Rice |
Conference USA |
54 |
1 |
116 |
Buffalo |
MAC |
53.5 |
3.5 |
117 |
Colorado State |
Mountain West |
52 |
1.5 |
118 |
New Mexico |
Mountain West |
51.5 |
1 |
119 |
Temple |
AAC |
51.5 |
2 |
120 |
Bowling Green |
MAC |
51.5 |
1 |
121 |
Louisiana-Monroe |
Sun Belt |
51 |
2 |
122 |
Texas State |
Sun Belt |
51 |
1.5 |
123 |
Colorado |
Pac-12 |
50.5 |
2 |
124 |
Charlotte |
Conference USA |
49.5 |
2 |
125 |
Nevada |
Mountain West |
48.5 |
3 |
126 |
New Mexico State |
Independent |
46.5 |
2 |
127 |
UConn |
Independent |
44.5 |
1 |
128 |
Akron |
MAC |
41 |
1 |
129 |
FIU |
Conference USA |
37.5 |
2 |
130 |
Hawaii |
Mountain West |
37.5 |
2 |
131 |
UMass |
Independent |
37.5 |
1.5 |
Here are my Week 5 Power Ratings Adjustments:
Up: West Virginia + 3, UTEP + 2, Baylor + 1.5, Kentucky + 1, Temple + 2, Kent State + 3, Notre Dame + 3.5, Middle Tennessee + 2.5, Penn State + 1.5, Louisville + 1, Wake Forest + 1.5, Florida State + 1.5, Navy + 2, Buffalo + 2, James Madison + 4.5, Duke + 2, Kansas + 5.5, Miami (OH) + 2, Arkansas State + 5, Wyoming + 3, Washington State + 4, Cal + 2.5, Washington + 1.5, Troy + 2.5, South Alabama + 5.5, TCU + 2, Texas Tech + 2, UL Monroe + 2, Rice + 2, Southern Miss + 2, Western Kentucky + 3, UNLV + 4.5, LSU + 2.5, San Jose State + 2, Ball State + 3, New Mexico State + 3
Down: Virginia Tech -3, Georgia State -3, Syracuse -2, Air Force -1.5, Boise State -3, Iowa State -2.5, UMass -2, Georgia -1, North Carolina -2.5, Miami (FL) -5.5, Central Michigan -3.5, South Florida -3, Michigan State -7, Clemson -2, Boston College -4, Rutgers -3, Northwestern -2, BYU -2.5, Hawaii -2.5, Arizona State -2.5, Arizona -2, Bowling Green -3 (QB inj – McDonald), Oklahoma -2, SMU -2, Texas -2, Louisiana -2.5, Houston -1, Memphis -1.5, Missouri -2, Auburn -2, Western Michigan -6, Virginia -2, Tennessee -2, Ohio -1.5, UTSA -2, Colorado State -3, FIU -2.5, Wisconsin -2
Injury*: Tulsa -6 (if QB Brin out), Purdue -6 (if O’Connell out)
Some notes on the biggest adjustments:
Michigan State -7: I still haven’t gone far enough on Sparty, but what a mess Mel Tucker’s team has been thus far. They were a regression candidate coming into the season because of their losses and last year’s resume, but it is shocking how inept this team has been.
Western Michigan -6: Some of this has to do with the play and the injury to Jack Salopek, but the Broncos are just a bad football team at this point. The line against San Jose State continued to grow and I had to make a sizable adjustment to this team. We’ll see if this is enough, but I’m not convinced that it is at this point.
Miami (FL) -5.5: Man, I really thought Miami was going to be good. Mario Cristobal was back at home. Josh Gattis left a good job at Michigan to work with Tyler Van Dyke in Coral Gables. Instead, the Hurricanes are a mess and Van Dyke has regressed as much as any quarterback in the country. This may not be enough of a move on “The U”, but it does address just how bad this team has been.
South Alabama + 5.5: I really, truly felt like I had properly rated the Jaguars coming into the season, but they continue to exceed expectations and have been priced like one of the better Group of Five teams in the market. This is also a touch-and-go situation in that I may not have adjusted them up enough. Kane Wommack will be a sought after candidate this year in the coaching carousel as some teams look to replace guys that took bigger jobs.
Kansas + 5.5: One of the most challenging hurdles to jump over is when a historically bad team is a lot better than past versions. UNLV (+ 4.5) falls into this category as well. What the Jayhawks are doing under Lance Leipold with Jalon Daniels at the helm really, truly stands out across the college football landscape and I have to tip my cap and give props to those teams.
Arkansas State + 5: The Red Wolves have been priced in a favorable light for the last few weeks. I’ve been reluctant to abandon my preseason research on a team that was downright awful last season, but it is clear that the talent has improved with this roster.
James Madison + 4.5: When a team transitions from FCS to FBS, there are a lot of questions. Those teams have fewer scholarships available and are unable to enjoy some of the perks that come with being a Division I-A team. Well, that hasn’t stopped JMU, who gets a big boost for a second straight week.
Here are my lines for Week 5:
Date |
Away |
Home |
My Line |
9/29 |
Utah State |
BYU |
-21.5 |
|
|
|
|
9/30 |
Tulane |
Houston |
+ 0.5 |
|
UTSA |
Middle Tennessee |
+ 5.5 |
|
San Diego State |
Boise State |
-8 |
|
Washington |
UCLA |
+ 5 |
|
New Mexico |
UNLV |
-12.5 |
|
|
|
|
10/1 |
Illinois |
Wisconsin |
-8.5 |
|
Northwestern |
Penn State |
-23.5 |
|
Louisville |
Boston College |
+ 12 |
|
Georgia Southern |
Coastal Carolina |
-7 |
|
Wake Forest |
Florida State |
-6 |
|
Georgia State |
Army |
-11 |
|
NC State |
Clemson |
-12 |
|
Georgia Tech |
Pitt |
-16 |
|
Michigan State |
Maryland |
-7 |
|
Virginia |
Duke |
-2.5 |
|
Virginia Tech |
North Carolina |
-6.5 |
|
Liberty |
Old Dominion |
+ 4 |
|
East Carolina |
South Florida |
+ 6.5 |
|
SMU |
UCF |
-6 |
|
Northern Illinois |
Ball State |
+ 3.5 |
|
Purdue |
Minnesota |
-4 |
|
Texas State |
James Madison |
-21 |
|
Navy |
Air Force |
-15 |
|
Oklahoma State |
Baylor |
+ 2.5 |
|
Iowa State |
Kansas |
+ 2.5 |
|
South Alabama |
Louisiana |
+ 5.5 |
|
Temple |
Memphis |
-16 |
|
Cincinnati |
Tulsa* (Brin inj) |
+ 16.5 |
|
UMass |
Eastern Michigan |
-21 |
|
Oregon State |
Utah |
-8.5 |
|
FIU |
New Mexico State |
-11 |
|
Cal |
Washington State |
-6 |
|
Colorado |
Arizona |
-16 |
|
Arizona State |
USC |
-24 |
|
Stanford |
Oregon |
-15.5 |
|
Kentucky |
Ole Miss |
-3 |
|
Texas Tech |
Kansas State |
-8.5 |
|
Rutgers |
Ohio State |
-35 |
|
Texas A&M |
Mississippi State |
+ 1 |
|
Oklahoma |
TCU |
+ 4 |
|
Michigan |
Iowa |
+ 14 |
|
West Virginia |
Texas |
-10 |
|
LSU |
Auburn |
+ 6 |
|
Alabama |
Arkansas |
+ 11.5 |
|
Georgia |
Missouri |
+ 31 |
|
Central Michigan |
Toledo |
-11.5 |
|
Miami OH |
Buffalo |
+ 4 |
|
Fresno State |
UConn |
+ 20.5 |
|
Bowling Green |
Akron |
+ 9.5 |
|
Ohio |
Kent State |
-5.5 |
|
Louisiana Monroe |
Read Full Article |